Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: Mr Cranky Date: Jul 1, 2012 9:01am
Forum: feature_films Subject: إعادة: العثور على الجماعة - الرجاء إزالة

هل أنت متأكد من حقوق التأليف والنشر غير صالحة؟ يبدو أن يكون في تنسيق التاريخ غير صحيح.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Quigs Date: Jul 1, 2012 9:50am
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: إعادة: العثور على الجماعة - الرجاء إزالة

What's it say Mr. C ?



Quigs

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: FGlenF Date: Jul 1, 2012 1:08pm
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: إعادة: العثور على الجماعة - الرجاء إزالة

He asked
"Are you sure the copyright is valid? Seems to be in the date format is incorrect."

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Moongleam Date: Jul 1, 2012 7:51pm
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: إعادة: العثور على الجماعة - الرجاء إزالة

I don't believe that films today need a valid copyright notice.

Video-Cellar:

These are the only requirements for copyright protection of a US work
in the USA I know. My sources, as always, are years of studying
copyright legislation, copyright office documents, scholarly legal
articles and working with PD material. These are the requirements I
use to judge whether a US film is PD.

Before 1950:
Correct Notice
Timely registration (within 3 months of publication)
Timely renewal (within the 27th-28th anniversary year window*)
copyright could be forfeited if published without correct notice or
not timely registered and renewed

1950 (this is the transitional year for the effects of the 1976 act to come in):
Correct Notice
Timely registration (within 3 months of publication)
OR Late Term Registration (at any time during the 28 year term)
Timely renewal (within the 27th-28th anniversary year window* or the
28th calandar year window*)
copyright could be forfeited if published without correct notice or
not timely renewed

1950-1963
Correct Notice
Registration (at any time during the first 28 year term)
Timely renewal (within the 28th calandar year window*)
copyright could be forfeited if published without correct notice or
not timely renewed

1964-1977
Correct Notice
copyright could be forfeited if published without correct notice.
Registration is only required for evidentiary purposes in pursuing
damages actions against infringers

1978-1989
Notice
copyright could be forfeited if published without notice provided
steps were not taken to rectify the ommission within 5 years from
publication (this could include including notices in later editions or
registration.). If a notice was included registration is only required
for evidentiary purposes in pursuing damages actions against
infringers

1989-present:
Work is created and or published
work is covered by copyright unless dedicated to the public domain or
released through an alternative licence.

*based on the year-in-notice.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Mr Cranky Date: Jul 1, 2012 3:57pm
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: إعادة: العثور على الجماعة - الرجاء إزالة

le pardon,
L'objectif principal était la date de copyright douteuse provoquant le film soit non qualifiée pour l'enregistrement. La vraie question est l'ancien "Conseil sur le contenu de documents d'archives admis" question. N'avons-nous pas besoin d'un forum séparé pour l'effacement du contenu des médias pour l'IA?

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: FGlenF Date: Jul 1, 2012 4:02pm
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: إعادة: العثور على الجماعة - الرجاء إزالة

Translation: In case Quigs wants to know.
forgiveness,
The main objective was the copyright date dubious causing the film to be unqualified for recording. The real question is the old "Council on the contents of archival documents admitted" issue. Do not we need a separate forum for erasure of media content for AI?

You have asked a question I can't answer. However any film that is less than a year old shouldn't be on the site. And it shouldn't matter where it's from. Unless it's public domain.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Quigs Date: Jul 1, 2012 1:39pm
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: إعادة: العثور على الجماعة - الرجاء إزالة

Oh I see. Thanls FGlenF.




Quis

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: FGlenF Date: Jul 1, 2012 9:04am
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: إعادة: العثور على الجماعة - الرجاء إزالة

The dates come from IMDb